Institutional Biosafety Committee, Revised 06/2023
The Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) is responsible for reviewing all research conducted at The Ohio State University involving recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecules and biohazards. Biohazards requiring an IBC protocol include all human source material (blood, tissue, cell lines, etc.), human pathogens and, in some cases, animal and exotic plant pathogens. An IBC protocol is submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) and is a comprehensive risk assessment of work involving biohazards or recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecules. IBC protocols are intended to ensure compliance with Federal Regulations outlined in the NIH Guidelines for Recombinant DNA, which ensure that novel, dangerous organisms are not created by genetic engineering.
Additionally, IBC protocols ensure that all research involving biohazards is conducted in a manner that minimizes risk to personnel, the community, and the environment.
The purpose of this Guidance Document is to provide PIs with information that will help ensure that the submitted IBC protocol contains the information that the IBC requires to make a decision, thereby expediting the approval process. The goal of the protocol is not to convince the committee that the work itself is without risk, but to demonstrate that all of the PIs understand the risks involved and are operating at the proper biosafety level to mitigate those risks.
The "Getting Started" step is a very important one. You will be given a list of YES/NO questions to answer pertaining to your proposed research. How you answer these questions will generate the "SmartForm" that you will complete for review by the IBC. It is extremely important that you read these questions and any sub-questions that appear, very carefully. The form that is generated is specific to the type of research you specify so all questions should be relevant if the Getting Started questions are answered correctly.
The purpose of the Descriptive Summary is to provide the IBC with adequate but concise information regarding the proposed research. There are four sections in the Descriptive Summary. Listed below each section are important components of each.
Provide a brief synopsis of the goals for the proposed research.
Provide a brief description of the laboratory procedures that will be used to achieve the goals for the proposed research; this must include descriptions of how any biohazards, rDNA, and/or animals are being used in those laboratory procedures. Simply listing laboratory procedures is not sufficient.
Discuss the specific risks associated with all biohazards/rDNA described in this protocol and detail what will be implemented to mitigate these risks (i.e. engineering controls, work practices, types of personal protective equipment (PPE) required, vector design, etc.) Risks and risk mitigation strategies should cover both study team members and animal care staff if applicable. Generic statements, such as "BSL2 practices will be used" or "appropriate PPE will be used" are not sufficient; the specific practices relevant to the proposed research should be briefly described. Waste infection and/or disposal should also be briefly described.
Please list any approved or pending protocols (IACUC, IRB or other IBC) that are associated with this research protocol.
This section should be completed if purchasing, creating, or receiving from a collaborator, any genetically modified animal. This includes, but is not limited to, knock-in, knock-out, and transgenic animals.
The IBC requires this information to ensure compliance with the NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules.
The proposed work may be classified as "EXEMPT" but the registration of this work via an IBC protocol is necessary to confirm that IBC approval per the NIH Guidelines is not required. Registration of commercially available genetically modified animals is required by OSU's IBC to cover the potential that a new strain created as a result of breeding registered animals would require approval under the NIH Guidelines.
The OSU Institutional Biosafety Committee requires a protocol submission for all research involving the use of recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecules. In the context of the NIH Guidelines, recombinant and synthetic nucleic acids are defined as:
While some recombinant and synthetic nucleic acid molecule research is exempt under the NIH Guidelines, the OSU IBC requires a protocol for all work of this nature to ensure that the proper reviews are taking place and that the work is truly exempt. Exempt protocols do not require an annual review or 5-year renewal.
Your research is NOT exempt from the NIH Guidelines if you work involves the any of the following:
The IBC requires this information to ensure compliance with the NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules. There are six categories of experiments involving recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecules described by the NIH Guidelines. It is the responsibility of the Principal Investigator to understand under which category, and specifically which section, of the NIH Guidelines his/her research belongs. For more information on these categories please review the NIH Guidelines, Section III (Experiments Covered by the NIH Guidelines) or the Institutional Biosafety Committee NIH Guideline Training.
The following information must be provided in the Recombinant DNA section of the protocol for research in all six NIH categories, including exempt research:
The main purpose of the Exposure Assessment and PPE section is to detail the consequences of accidental exposure to each agent listed in the protocol. This includes assessing effects on personnel, community, and the environment.
When completing this section, be sure to check the highest risk group of the agents that you will be using in your research. Only one risk group should be selected. Based on the highest risk group selected, consider and select the appropriate biocontainment level for the proposed experiments. In some cases, you may select multiple biocontainment levels if work with agents of differing risk groups will be used in separate lab facilities. Otherwise, always select the highest biocontainment level appropriate.
When completing the animal section, please consider both the innate hazard of working with animals as well as the agent being delivered to the animals. What is the source of the hazard to animal handlers and animal care staff?
Note: Projects involving the collection and analysis of animal feces may require an IBC protocol. A risk assessment should be done in conjunction with the EHS Biosafety staff to determine if zoonotic pathogens may be present in the feces and potential occupational exposures could occur.
Appendix A covers specific information that should be included in an IBC protocol if LENTIVIRAL VECTORS (LVV) are being used.
The answers supplied in this section are important to ensure that the correct subsequent sections are populated in eIBC. The use of LVV requires:
This section should include the specific risks of working with LVV (ie. insertational mutagenesis, the oncongenic potential of the transgene, and/or recombination resulting in replication-competent virus) and the safety measures that will be implemented to mitigate these risks. Specific information that should be included in the protocol's risk assessment are as follows:
Information about LVV | Low-Risk Examples | High-Risk Examples |
---|---|---|
Transgene Function | Protein-based fluorescence tags, GFP | Silence a tumor-suppressor or express an oncogene (e.g., Ras, Myc, etc.) |
Number of plasmids used to generate virions | 3-4 plasmids | 2 or less plasmids |
Mutations within LVVs | Loss of replicating long terminal repeats (LTRs) and other deletions/mutations | Wild-type LTRs |
Expression control elements | Weak promoters | Strong promoters present (CMV, SV40) |
Host range | Non-human tropism | Extended host range (e.g., VSV G) |
Concentration | <1 x 106 infectious units/mL | >1 x 106 infectious units/mL |
Production volume | <100 mL | >100 mL |
Percentage of genome retained or substituted | <2/3 | >2/3 |
Include a statement regarding the generation of the LVV system being used and tropism of the LVV.
Covers specific information that should be included in an IBC protocol when ABSL2 work is proposed.
The answers supplied in this section are important to ensure that the correct subsequent sections are populated in eIBC. Be sure to you select "Yes" to Will your research involve animals?
This section should include the specific risks of working with the biohazard in an animal model and the safety measures that will be implemented to mitigate these risks. Specific information that should be included in the protocol's risk assessment are as follows:
The default for ABLS2 cage processing in the ULAR vivarium will be autoclaving of cages with bedding and carcasses being disposed of as infectious waste. Cages would need to be identified at the cage and room level. Such cage management will be required for the duration of the study unless otherwise justified in the descriptive summary for the particular agent. For agents that are excreted for a defined period of time (i.e.72 hours post exposure) justification must be included in the descriptive summary. At the completion of the time, the research team can move animals to a new clean cage which is no longer requires management (labels or processing) as an ABSL2 cage.
Transport of ABLS2 cages requires secondary containment when outside of housing room or suite to ensure that in the case of a spill, the infectious agent is contained within the transport container. A spill kit must be available.
Be sure to address PPE requirements in the animal housing space separately from PPE needs in the lab. Within ULAR, approved housing for ABLS2 cages requires a room containing a biosafety cabinet with the following PPE requirements; hair bonnet, mask, gloves and disposable gown. Required practices when working in the biosafety cabinet hood including disinfection of surfaces with Spor-Klenz (or an equivalent tuberculocidal agent) before and after animal work. Those standards apply to ULAR rooms with a health status of level #1-4. Consider the impact a release of the hazard may have on humans or the surrounding animal colony.
The rodents housed in ULAR space are SPF (Specific Pathogen Free) for of a list of pathogens (viral, bacterial and parasitic). The ULAR Quality Assurance (QA) Program ensure these goals via vendor approval, animal quarantine requirements, and ongoing surveillance of the colony using a rodent sentinel program. The restricted pathogen list includes zoonotic agents as well as pathogens that have potential impact on overall animal health and research activities.
Consider if respiratory protection (N-95) will be needed when experimental activities cannot be performed inside a biosafety cabinet.
Within each ULAR vivarium, a rodent CO2 euthanasia chamber is available and is located outside the biosafety cabinet.
What are the likely routes of exposure?
Animal bite should be checked only when the agent is expressed in saliva or if it is unknown. If you are unsure how to answer these questions or need additional information, you are encouraged to discuss the details with your clinical veterinarian in advance of protocol submission.
Article ID: 99
Created: April 9, 2025
Last Updated: April 9, 2025
Online URL: https://ohiostateresearch.knowledgebase.co/article/institutional-biosafety-committee-40;ibc-41;-e-protocol-guidance-99.html